So, I really want to discuss some things happening in the world with the Church lately, but I don't feel it really appropriate for Facebook. Maybe I shouldn't even be blogging about it or talking about it at all, but then I think, that's how minorities end up ruling the world. The majority doesn't speak up. We've been given the gift of the Internet to help spread the gospel and facilitate discussions.
So I'm gonna be real here for a minute. A minute I should have just gone to bed already, but this weighs too heavily on my mind since I saw the news.
I'm pretty sure anyone who actually reads my blog has heard about Ordain Women and their founder, Kate Kelly. I'm sure you knew she had a church disciplinary council occur, and you've probably heard by now that she has been excommunicated.
I'll tell you right now that in following the flood of news stories surrounding Sister Kelly, I have gotten pretty upset. She just frustrates me. But then I think, how not Christlike of me. So instead of getting mad about it, I try to still love her and understand where she is at and just feel sad. Folks, this situation is sad on lots of levels.
Let's get the more selfish level out of the way - the Church's image. For someone who claims to love being a Mormon and has happily let that fact define her, she has done a lot to injure the Church in the eyes of the world. Those not of our faith and not understanding the delicacies of the situation may find the church outdated and sexist (which apparently is what OW thinks anyway. Win for them.) Some may be interested in the church and talking with the missionaries, but then decide to stop those discussions because of all of the negative press. That is one of the reasons Sister Kelly was excommunicated, for leading others away, however unintentional it may be.
I have appreciated reading comments from non-members who watch or read interviews with Sister Kelly and have realized the errors in her logic or have agreed that she is making a spectacle in order to make a spectacle and gain some attention. Hopefully most will realize that she truly is a minority voice. Even others who question why women are not ordained have not agreed with OW's tactics or outspokenness.
I have been impressed with the Church's responses and outreach. The Church doesn't often enter the public forum in these manners because they don't feel the need to defend things, necessarily. However, I have never before seen a spokesperson conduct a live interview over such a hot topic as has happened regarding Sister Kelly's (then) pending disciplinary council. I don't think it was maybe as effective as it could have been, but I was proud to know that the Church realized there was a greater need to speak up and appear in the public eye as doing something. Heaven knows they do lots behind the scenes. However, this is another point that just made me sad. One woman's public demands for a change in church doctrine and practices has pushed the church into this arena that they normally don't need to delve into. Between this and all of the LGBTQ (btw, when they heck did we decide we needed a Q on the end of that?) stuff going on, I feel the Second Coming may be nearer than I originally thought. That's off topic, though :) But really, if the church has to keep issuing statements to defend themselves and correct errors in your presentation of matters, I think you're pushing a bit too far. Don't you?
Then there is Sister Kelly herself. Her whole situation just saddens me (when I remember to let go of my anger, anyway). Sister Kelly is a feminist in the way you think of feminists being. Outspoken for unnecessary sameness in the name of equality. In some arenas, sameness is the only way to achieve equality. The Priesthood and the Church are not among those. She makes me sad because she doesn't see it, and she is so busy trying to tear it down that she won't be able to see it. Then, of course, there's the matter of bringing a whole lotta other souls down with her. But, I digress.
Sister Kelly is very pro-woman in all things, from what I've seen and read. Upon reading the letter she submitted to the disciplinary council, I realized that she opted not to take her husband's name when she married. Sure, lots of people don't. Really, it's not a big deal to most people. But that was sort of the straw that broke the do-I-publicly-discuss-this camel's back. I admit when I was younger I questioned if I would take my husband's name. I was going to be a psychiatrist, and I thought Dr. Erdmann sounded pretty good. If my husband's name wasn't as good, I thought I'd just leave it for him to keep ;) However, what about my children? Would they all take their father's name? Would the girls follow me and the boys follow him? For me personally, it was a symbol of truly accepting and giving myself to him, by taking his name. (Just like we do when we take the name of Christ upon us - we are His and associate ourselves with Him.) For me to fully submit to my husband, I had to be willing to take his name. (To clarify, when I say submit myself, I mean this definition of "submit:" to offer. I offered him myself, as he did to me when we were married. Sound equal? ;)) Anyway, having that symbology behind taking my husband's name, I was saddened to see Sister Kelly did not become Sister Ransom at her sealing in 2006.
Then let's talk about her views on the disciplinary council and excommunication. I know some people feel it rude or punitive. Clearly Sister Kelly felt that way, as she called it such in various interviews and in her letter to the council. Let me tell you, it is not. I know it is not. Someone dear to me went through a disciplinary council and was subsequently excommunicated. To my knowledge (we don't keep in touch now), he has never been rebaptized. That is also sad because he, like Sister Kelly, didn't realize it is a step in the repentance process.
I'm sorry, Sister Kelly, but I have a testimony that backs up the Church's statement on disciplinary councils. They are not punitive beyond being the consequence of your actions. I understand you may feel it unjustified and are hurt, but the men, who are acting with the authority of the Priesthood you covet, have your best, eternal interests at heart. They have been ordained to act in this capacity and are lead by the Spirit to reach this conclusion. Excommunication isn't meant to shun you or cast you out of your congregation and community, as you seem to feel. Excommunication is to, as in the word of a friend, reset your life. Prior to your excommunication you were endowed in the temple. With that endowment comes greater covenants and responsibilities. Excommunication removes those obligations from you so that the eternal consequences of your disobedience are less than they would be otherwise.
Luke 12: 47-48
47 And that servant, which knew his lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.
Excommunication notches it down to "few stripes." It is the same for your being asked to refrain from taking the sacrament or paying tithes and offerings. With these things, there is a responsibility and obligation, which are currently removed from you so as to not damn you further.
I sincerely hope you continue to attend church, read the scriptures, and have personal prayer. I hope you will be open to the Spirit which will testify the truth of all things to you. I fear that these things may not happen, or at least not for some time. I fear for what these actions mean for you, your family, and the thousands of others you will have influenced. I know you realize this decision has eternal consequences for you and your family. I only hope that will be humbling enough for you to realize the Church isn't trying to punish you or make an example of you, but rather, trying to save you and bring you back into the fold. Excommunication is not done lightly. It is not done because your former leaders in Virginia have a vendetta against you. Rather, they see the damage you are doing, not only to yourself, but also to your family and the world at large.
Galatians 6:7
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
Sister Kelly, I do not know you. I don't appreciate the actions you have taken and the consequences they are having. But, I am trying so hard to love you. I hope you feel the love of our Savior and Father in Heaven. I know people are imperfect, and you have and will continue to meet members and non-members alike who will not act in a Christlike manner because they don't agree, don't know you, or are hurt by your actions. Please know that someone here loves you and is concerned. While I do not agree with your position or methods, my heart aches for you. I hope one day you will see and understand; one day you will go through the repentance process and be counted among His sheep again.